====== Starlink to beam down more EMF pollution ======

12,000 of these satellites will be beaming down on us once the Starlink system is in full operation.

What happens when a complex modulation of  Starlink, 5G at 28.375 GHz et.al. , 77 GHz from vehicle RADAR, and 5.9 GHz from Vehicle Infrastructure (V2X) mix biologically? I doubt anyone knows. Is anyone other than me even asking that question? That there are only thermal effects has long sense been disproved.

I see many people trying to cash in by selling EMF protection widgets and shielding courses for 5G.  Yet they mention nothing about any of these other sources of electromagnetic pollution.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonathanocallaghan/2019/05/23/spacex-launches-first-starlink-satellites-in-space-internet-battle/#bpaddock.com/emf

A decent spectrum analyzer to actually study this stuff correctly starts at a base price of $170,000.  Fully loaded price of $1,300,000.  Cheap handheld meters don't get it done once you start to consider all the heterodyning harmonics etc.
Most of the videos I see on Internet with handheld meters are claiming to show things that the meter is incapable of measuring.

Keysight's (Formerly Agilent, Formerly HP) new UXR1104A Infiniium UXR-Series Oscilloscope. The most capable model has a 110 GHz bandwidth and samples at up to 256 GSa/s - on each of four channels.

https://literature.cdn.keysight.com/litweb/pdf/5992-3132EN.pdf

54 Minute long video of what is in it:

https://www.patreon.com/posts/keysight-uxr-bw-21602957

{{tag>Starlink, EMF, 5G, V2X}}

~~LINKBACK~~