blog:bpaddock:starlink_to_beam_down_more_emf_pollution

no way to compare when less than two revisions

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


—blog:bpaddock:starlink_to_beam_down_more_emf_pollution [2019/05/25 11:42] (current) – created bpaddock
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Starlink to beam down more EMF pollution ======
  
 +12,000 of these satellites will be beaming down on us once the Starlink system is in full operation.
 +
 +What happens when a complex modulation of  Starlink, 5G at 28.375 GHz et.al. , 77 GHz from vehicle RADAR, and 5.9 GHz from Vehicle Infrastructure (V2X) mix biologically? I doubt anyone knows. Is anyone other than me even asking that question? That there are only thermal effects has long sense been disproved.
 +
 +I see many people trying to cash in by selling EMF protection widgets and shielding courses for 5G.  Yet they mention nothing about any of these other sources of electromagnetic pollution.
 +
 +https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonathanocallaghan/2019/05/23/spacex-launches-first-starlink-satellites-in-space-internet-battle/#bpaddock.com/emf
 +
 +A decent spectrum analyzer to actually study this stuff correctly starts at a base price of $170,000.  Fully loaded price of $1,300,000.  Cheap handheld meters don't get it done once you start to consider all the heterodyning harmonics etc.
 +Most of the videos I see on Internet with handheld meters are claiming to show things that the meter is incapable of measuring.
 +
 +Keysight's (Formerly Agilent, Formerly HP) new UXR1104A Infiniium UXR-Series Oscilloscope. The most capable model has a 110 GHz bandwidth and samples at up to 256 GSa/s - on each of four channels.
 +
 +https://literature.cdn.keysight.com/litweb/pdf/5992-3132EN.pdf
 +
 +54 Minute long video of what is in it:
 +
 +https://www.patreon.com/posts/keysight-uxr-bw-21602957
 +
 +{{tag>Starlink, EMF, 5G, V2X}}
 +
 +~~LINKBACK~~
  • blog/bpaddock/starlink_to_beam_down_more_emf_pollution.txt
  • Last modified: 2019/05/25 11:42
  • by bpaddock